GERMANY-PASSENGER-LISTS-L Archives

From: Siegfried Rambaum <>
Subject: Re: [G-P-L] Brand/Berner/Bach
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 20:44:35 -0400
In-Reply-To: <001001c7ea9a$1350e400$0200000a@your7f03cac70f>

Good evening, Judy;

> John was actually Johannus Franciscus Schmitt on his church papers.

He had these names on his catholic church papers ONLY, but not in re-
ality. Catholic baptismal documents latinized the given names of in-
fants. And the priest were not even good at this in most instances. The
proper Latin form for John would not have been Johannus, but Ioannes.

Siegfried

This thread:

• [G-P-L] Brand/Berner/Bach by "Margaret O'Hagan" <>
  • Re: [G-P-L] Brand/Berner/Bach by Siegfried Rambaum <>
  • Re: [G-P-L] Brand/Berner/Bach by "Chuck" <>
    • Re: [G-P-L] Brand/Berner/Bach by "Margaret O'Hagan" <>
      • Re: [G-P-L] Brand/Berner/Bach by "Chuck" <>
        • Re: [G-P-L] Brand/Berner/Bach by Siegfried Rambaum <>
          • Re: [G-P-L] Brand/Berner/Bach by "Margaret O'Hagan" <>
            • Re: [G-P-L] Brand/Berner/Bach by "JudyKS" <>

              • Re: [G-P-L] Brand/Berner/Bach by Siegfried Rambaum <>

            • Re: [G-P-L] Brand/Berner/Bach by Siegfried Rambaum <>
              • Re: [G-P-L] Brand/Berner/Bach by "Margaret O'Hagan" <>
            • Re: [G-P-L] Brand/Berner/Bach by "Ursula B. Adamson" <>
              • Re: [G-P-L] Brand/Berner/Bach by "Chuck" <>
  • Re: [G-P-L] Brand/Berner/Bach by "Susan Clark" <>