GenMassachusetts-L Archives

From: Proctor <>
Subject: Re: [GM-L] John BALL - Watertown... no mention of age...
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2000 20:34:57 -0400

What exactly is a freeman and how does it compare to a yeoman?

----------
> From:
> To:
> Subject: [GM-L] John BALL - Watertown... no mention of age...
> Date: Thursday, March 30, 2000 5:14 PM
>
> In a message dated 3/30/00 8:28:39 AM Pacific Standard Time,

> writes:
>
> << Jan,
>
> Thanks so much for the lookup. Disappointing is the correct word. Pope
has
> confused the John BALLs. John Jr. was the husband of Elizabeth and father
to
> Abigail. I am starting to wonder if the elder John BALL was made freeman
22
> May 1650,or if in fact it was really John, Jr.
>
> Do you happen to know if age is listed when they apply to become
freemen?
>
> Thanks again,
>
> Cherryl >>
> ~~~~~~~~~~
> No. Sorry. I just copied it "as is". There was no mention of age
at
> that time.
> It sure would help a lot if we could know more of those little details,
> wouldn't it?
> Jan
>
>
> ==== GenMassachusetts Mailing List ====
> To unsubscribe: http://www.rootsweb.com/~maillist/us/index.html
>
> ==============================
> Personalized Mailing Lists: never miss a connection again.
> http://pml.rootsweb.com/
> Brought to you by RootsWeb.com.
>

This thread:

• Re: [GM-L] John BALL - Watertown... no mention of age... by Proctor <>

  • Re: [GM-L] John BALL - Watertown... no mention of age... by Warren Wetmore <>
  • Re: [GM-L] John BALL - Watertown... no mention of age... by