GenMassachusetts-L Archives

Archiver > GenMassachusetts > 2001-06 > 0992907943


From:
Subject: Re: [GM-L] Tilden, Nathaniel- daughter Elizabeth md Wm Bassett?
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 19:45:43 EDT


Dear Eleanor,

No, Abraham and Roger are distinct lines and were among the earliest Shaw
settlers in the Colonies. As for the "many generations connected to one
Roger Shaw," I assume you're referring to my two distinct Shaw lines - Roger
(1594-1661) and Seth (1760-1837). Their descendants, Lyman Philander Shaw
and Adaline Washburn Shaw, respectively, married. They were not known to be
related. Sorry, but I don't find a Byram among my surnames and Abraham the
First is not connected in any manner.

Best wishes, Jane

Jane Luise Shaw, 12th generation direct descendant of Roger Shaw (1594-1661).
Researching (with dates of migration to America): Behr (1866-Illinois), Buck
(1635-Connecticut), Campbell (1784?-Illinois), Garnett (1610-Virginia),
Graves (1609-Virginia), Hadaway (b. 1772 Massachusetts), Hunter
(1784?-Illinois), Logan (1845-Illinois), Mason (married 1760-Massachusetts),
(Rice (1693-Virginia), Shaw (Seth born 1760-Massachusetts) and (Roger
1636-Massachusetts), Sherman (1637-Massachusetts), Standish
(1620-Massachusetts), Tarbell (1654-Virginia), Taylor (1797-Virginia),
Washburn (1760+/- Massachusetts/Vermont) and Willis (1762?-Kentucky). LOOK UPS
available from Farwell's Roger Shaw, Claremont, NH Cemetery Index (1896), Of
Purse and Person (Early Virginia), Dow's History of Hampton, Records of
Selectmen of Cambridge 1630-1703, and Garnett's Robert Kirtley Garnett. Some
GEDcoms available.

This thread: