NUTTER-L Archives

From: Charlene Ramel <>
Subject: Re: [NUTTER-L] Elizabeth Goodwin ?
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 22:31:18 -0500

Jeff,

I appreciate the clarification and tis not your fault...I blame
Christopher and his kids and grandkids...the funny this is, we still
have Matthews, Christophers, Rebeccas, ....in our line.

Charlene

This thread:

• [NUTTER-L] Elizabeth Goodwin ? by "Marlene Andre" <>
  • Re: [NUTTER-L] Elizabeth Goodwin ? by <>
  • Re: [NUTTER-L] Elizabeth Goodwin ? by "The Shorts" <>
  • Re: [NUTTER-L] Elizabeth Goodwin ? by "The Shorts" <>
  • Re: [NUTTER-L] Elizabeth Goodwin ? by "daleandjatko" <>
  • Re: [NUTTER-L] Elizabeth Goodwin ? by "The Shorts" <>
  • Re: [NUTTER-L] Elizabeth Goodwin ? by Charlene Ramel <>
  • Re: [NUTTER-L] Elizabeth Goodwin ? by "The Shorts" <>
  • Re: [NUTTER-L] Elizabeth Goodwin ? by Jeff Hatfield <>
  • Re: [NUTTER-L] Elizabeth Goodwin ? by Charlene Ramel <>
  • Re: [NUTTER-L] Elizabeth Goodwin ? by Charlene Ramel <>
  • Re: [NUTTER-L] Elizabeth Goodwin ? by Jeff Hatfield <>

  • Re: [NUTTER-L] Elizabeth Goodwin ? by Charlene Ramel <>

  • Re: [NUTTER-L] Elizabeth Goodwin ? by Charlene Ramel <>
  • Re: [NUTTER-L] Elizabeth Goodwin ? by <>
  • Re: [NUTTER-L] Elizabeth Goodwin ? by "The Shorts" <>
  • Re: [NUTTER-L] Elizabeth Goodwin ? by <>
  • Re: [NUTTER-L] Elizabeth Goodwin ? by Jeff Hatfield <>
  • Re: [NUTTER-L] Elizabeth Goodwin ? by <>