SAMPSON-L Archives

From: <>
Subject: Re: [SAMPSON] Re: Certainly Worth Reading
Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 15:44:02 EDT

"Well isn't that special ?"

In a message dated 5/5/2000 8:39:34 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
writes:

<< will NOT argue about this with you. This is a genealogy list and I have
said before that religion is only to be discussed in the context of helping
us find our ancestors. Of course it is necessary to mention specific
churches if that is where the records are contained, as are military
records. It is too easy, however, to go beyond that and start espousing
doctrine. The same thing with politics. Both are issues which are too
emotionally charged and this is NOT what this list if for. If you wish to
discuss those things, outside of genealogy, please go elsewhere.

This topic is now closed.

Marsha


----- Original Message -----
From: <>
To: <>
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2000 9:22 PM
Subject: Re: [SAMPSON] Re: Certainly Worth Reading


There was little in it smacking of religion or politics, just soldiers and
partriotism, all of which is now denigrated or expunged from everything in
favour of flaccid, fey political correctness. Hereinafter, all mention of
soldiery and patriotism, heavily steeped in religion in the past, should not
be part of the forum, including mention of SAMPSONs in any war or the
Churches SAMPSONs attended, which can give telling clues.

Miss Désirée de Nantes

This thread:

• [SAMPSON] Certainly Worth Reading by "Lyn Sherwood" <>
  • [SAMPSON] Re: Certainly Worth Reading by "Cherokelt" <>
  • Re: [SAMPSON] Re: Certainly Worth Reading by <>
  • Re: [SAMPSON] Re: Certainly Worth Reading by david grierson <>
  • Re: [SAMPSON] Re: Certainly Worth Reading by "Cherokelt" <>

  • Re: [SAMPSON] Re: Certainly Worth Reading by <>