YOXALL-L Archives

Archiver > YOXALL > 2007-10 > 1192632019


From: "peter byford" <>
Subject: Re: [YOXALL] Lily Yoxall born 1890
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 15:40:19 +0100
References: <001b01c81016$eaade910$7ebb1852@THENEWPC><000d01c81066$6311d200$22d6a13a@PC1>


Janet,
Just looked more carefully and it is a "second marriage" for Jane with
children Martha (c1873), John Thomas (c1874), Ernest (c1877) and Clara Fair
(c1880) . Any ideas?
Regards,
Peter

----- Original Message -----
From: "Janet" <>
To: <>
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 3:35 AM
Subject: Re: [YOXALL] Lily Yoxall born 1890


> Hello Peter,
>
> According to my tree Jane Bradley was only 19 when she had Hannah born
> c1861 and Thomas Yoxall born 1839 was the father. She was still married
> to Thomas when she had Ernest born 1877, so I doubt very much that she
> married someone else before Thomas.
>
> Regards,
> Janet
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: peter byford
> To:
> Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 1:06 AM
> Subject: [YOXALL] Lily Yoxall born 1890
>
>
> Hi Folks,
>
> A GR correspondent is the granddaughter of Lily Yoxall and her husband
> Harold Mottershead(new to me). This information led me to look at the
> Mottersheads in my tree - married to Ernest etc. These are not linked to
> Lily's line - maybe it will help to make that link.
>
> I noticed that Ernest who married Lily Mottershead has a mother Jane
> Bradley but an unknown Yoxall as father . Jane apparently married an
> Unknown Yoxall and then Thomas. Is this correct, does anyone know who Jane
> Bradley's first husband was please?
>
> I will let you know if she has any more information.
> Regards,
> Peter
> Peter G Byford
> ALL MESSAGES CHECKED BY VIRGIN NETGUARD ANTI-VIRUS
>
> -------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
> with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes
> in the subject and the body of the message
>
> -------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
> with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes
> in the subject and the body of the message

This thread: